FIRSTwiki talk:Yearly Game page format

From FIRSTwiki

Any other changes/suggestions before I start implementing this? --Sciencewhiz 14:46, 16 Jun 2004 (EDT)

It looks good to me, though I'm sure I'll find some problem with it eventually. I do have a few points that are worth thinking about, though. Is it worthwhile to have a section called Controversies, or some such, for issues like entanglement or collusion, or would this best be put in Misc. Info.? Also, it seems like it might be worth mentioning the Q&A system, as it has changed considerably over the years (but I don't know if we should mention it here, or find some other page for it). --Mrawls 15:19, 16 Jun 2004 (EDT)

I would think that each of the controversies should be covered in their own page, and then it can be mentioned in the Misc. Info. That way when someone hears someone else talk about collusion, they can go straight to the wiki page on collusion. I hadn't though about that before, though. As for Q/A, I think it's probably short enough to mention in the rules section. --Sciencewhiz 15:56, 16 Jun 2004 (EDT)