Template talk:FIRSTwiki awardindex

From FIRSTwiki

I changed to this version because the table on the side really didn't look very good and was taking valuable real estate. This makes the articles flow more smoothly, while still providing a useful reference for the various awards. If the index is at the bottom of the article, the table isn't "forced" on the user, like the previous version, but it still serves its purpose. --Mrawls 21:16, 23 Jun 2004 (EDT)

Also, it seems redundant and unnecessary to have this index *and* Category:Awards. The purpose of a category is to automatically generate lists ... but in this case we're making the list manually. I don't know which we should prefer, but why have both? --Mrawls 21:19, 23 Jun 2004 (EDT)

True. And the index is so huge that a seperate page would be better. --Astronouth7303 22:32, 23 Jun 2004 (EDT)

So, do we want the index or the category? It's unlikely that the awards are going to be changing at a rate too dificult to keep up with, so I don't think a category is necessary here, and the index is just as suited to the job. --Mrawls 13:33, 24 Jun 2004 (EDT)